Supreme Court expands gun rights in major Second Amendment ruling :

[PresidentElectSquirrel]

The Interesting Part . Bidens Signature Only Applies to " Federal Areas " ,


.

They need to protect them from themselves.  Gee if we keep pulling these false flags somebody's going to get hurt.  That's right there Brandon, you need more gun control over yourself.  Brilliant!  Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Only to federal areas because they know it wouldn't stand litigation against states' rights.  
Same reason the Red Flag law will pretty much hit a wall when the federal government won't be able to properly explain why citizens can lose a constitutional right under the guise of a simple accusation without evidence, charge or proof.

[counterintelligence]

The Interesting Part . Bidens Signature Only Applies to " Federal Areas " ,


.

They need to protect them from themselves.  Gee if we keep pulling these false flags somebody's going to get hurt.  That's right there Brandon, you need more gun control over yourself.  Brilliant!  Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Only to federal areas because they know it wouldn't stand litigation against states' rights.  
Same reason the Red Flag law will pretty much hit a wall when the federal government won't be able to properly explain why citizens can lose a constitutional right under the guise of a simple accusation without evidence, charge or proof.

It might be important to know this little jurisdictional limitation.  But they'll make people think that it is more than that.

[Heir]

One Thing to Know and Consider , The so called Bill of Rights are Articles in Addendum . Part and Parcel With the Constitution .


.

[Aquarius]

They need to protect them from themselves.  Gee if we keep pulling these false flags somebody's going to get hurt.  That's right there Brandon, you need more gun control over yourself.  Brilliant!  Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?

Only to federal areas because they know it wouldn't stand litigation against states' rights.  
Same reason the Red Flag law will pretty much hit a wall when the federal government won't be able to properly explain why citizens can lose a constitutional right under the guise of a simple accusation without evidence, charge or proof.

It might be important to know this little jurisdictional limitation.  But they'll make people think that it is more than that.

Sounds to me like attorneys will be making a ton of $$$$$$$$$$$$  over the next few months or years.