Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)

Drone regulations were probably started about the time that an Obama appointed Michael Huerta became FAA administrator who is tagged as not being any more affluent at aviation than the current Biden nominee.

Trump criticizes FAA administrator Michael Huerta.  Is this guy even a pilot?

Maybe this explains all the weird drone regulations that don't make any sense and are only concerned about identifying a drone operator to be heckled by an administrator that doesn't know whether they are following the rules or not.


Michael Huerta steps down from FAA administrator because of a mean tweet from orange man bad. Bring back the mean tweets.
Like Reply

Bidens nominee for the faa administrator has no equity or anything to give.

The Constitution protects the rights of all citizens, not illegal aliens, so there is no systemic racism possible under this republic.
Like Reply

Biden nominee for FAA administrator previously held for corruption allegations from when he was at the Los Angeles transit authority, and then moved to the Denver International Airport.

He stepped down from the position in LA and then a couple months later was serving in Denver.

I'm wondering if he also didn't have something to do with the unfinished 500 miles of train tracks in LA?
Like Reply
The deep state takes down the world trade center with a military drone or dew weapons and ever since they've been trying everything to legislate drone use?  

The Fourth branch of government, an unelected and unaccountable one started with the predrafted patRIOT act.

Heritage oversight project looking at 7 lawsuits related to selective enforcement by fib and doj.

Maybe related?

[Image: gang-of-eight-2021-v2.jpg]

The 2021 gang of 8 reviewing intelligence documents.   Facepalm  Even our current replacement for speaker of the house.

The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.

This example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the Executive Branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the process became the bigger issue, and the lack of immediate Legislative Branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance. The outcomes of the usurpation played out over the next four years; Donald J. Trump was kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger issue of the collapse still exists.

The downstream consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised. Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now subservient to the Intelligence Branch.

The “National Cybersecurity Strategy” aligns with, supports, and works in concert with a total U.S. surveillance system, where definitions of information are then applied to “cybersecurity” and communication vectors. This policy is both a surveillance system and an information filtration prism where the government will decide what is information, disinformation, misinformation and malinformation, then act upon it.

In part, this appears to be a response to the revelations around government influence of social media, the Twitter Files. Now we see the formalization of the intent. The government will be the arbiter of truth and cyber security, not the communication platforms or private companies. This announcement puts the government in control.

All of the control systems previously assembled under the guise of the Dept of Homeland Security now become part of the online, digital national security apparatus. I simply cannot emphasis enough how dangerous this is, and the unspoken motive behind it; however, to the latter, you are part of a small select group who are capable of understanding what is in this announcement without me spelling it out.

Remember, we have already lost the judicial branch to the interests of the national security state. All judicial determinations are now in deference to what is called broadly “national security,” and the only arbiter of what qualifies to be labeled as a national security interest is the same institutional system who hides the corruption and surveillance behind the label they apply.

We cannot fight our way through the complexity of what is being assembled, until the American People approach the big questions from the same baseline of understanding. What is the root cause that created the system? From there, this announcement takes on a more clarifying context – where we realize this is the formalization of the previously hidden process.

Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; the institutions were already weaponized by the Patriot Act. What Obama and Holder did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons of government only targeted one side of the political continuum.

This point is where many people understandably get confused.

Elevator Speech:

(1) The Patriot Act turned the intel surveillance radar from foreign searches for terrorists to domestic searches for terrorists.
(2) Obama/Biden then redefined what is a “terrorist” to include their political opposition.
Like Reply
[Image: 8m92nrx4ykw11.jpg]
Like Reply
Like Reply

The faa needs to do the same.
Like Reply

DOT says that Phil Washington as Biden nominee doesn't need a waiver to be FAA administrator.

Trying to say that legitimate reasons to deny Biden nominee is just a witch hunt.

No he needs something that says he needs to know what the fuck he is doing.  But since Demoncrats always appoint some dumb ass, that Republicans are just stalling.  Diversity is just an excuse to hire a complete flunky.
Like Reply

Let's try identifying those USA made Chinese balloons first.
Like Reply

Past FAA administrators with no pilots license/aviation experience endorsing yet another failure to be nominated by Biden.
Like Reply

Forum Jump: